In the News…

 “The current national debate on health care is nothing new. The founding fathers debated their own health care regulations — and faced a revolt — some 200 years ago.”  ~ Andrew Wehrman, an article for the Boston Globe, ”A Pox on You”

The modern-day healthcare revolt is upon us whether we like it or not.  When a hot-button debate typically arises on religion, privacy, gun rights, etc. – some on both sides inevitably list the Founding Fathers among their supporters.  However, not so much on health care.  After all, Colonial Americans did not know anything about germs or viruses, and very few ever visited a doctor.  But, in a story in the Boston Globe, doctoral student Andrew Wehrman suggests that public health was, indeed, a vital issue in an America that faced smallpox and yellow fever.

Mr. Wehrman tells the story of a group of men from the Massachusetts town of Marblehead who burned down the town’s brand-new hospital to protest the high price of health care. Here is the podcast from the Boston Globe…  http://www.npr.org/player/v2/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=1&islist=false&id=113543985&m=113545886

Yesterday marked a controversial victory for Michigan as state legislators on the House Health Policy Committee voiced their opinions and voted “NO” in a 9-5 vote on the proposed “state healthcare exchange” that would be regulated by the Federal Government in regards to the unpopular “Affordable Care Act” that President Obama forced into law on March 23, 2010, even though the fact that upwards of 63% of Americans were against this unprecedented mandate.   Click here to read full published article at Examiner.com

Take the Poll:

 

 

 

“I have no qualifications to do anything else and there weren’t any formal application forms you had to fill in for stand-up, so I thought I’d give that a twist.”  ~ Dylan Moran, Comedian

This philosophy is appropriate for Comedians and, perhaps, some in the entertainment business, however, should NOT be the motivation for a candidate running for a political office!

The mantra of more and more people complaining about recent elections and their elected officials “failing them” is adnauseum at best.  Here is a novel concept:  in the last county elections of the year, (specifically county party boards) and in the near future, state convention elections of both the Democratic and Republican parties – Citizens who are elected, local delegates with responsibility should show due diligence when executing their right to vote!  Fellow citizens voted you in to represent them in an honest, knowledgeable and ethical manner so it is up to you to cast your votes prudently and not on sensation, whim or pressure.

If one desires good principles and values from those who will be leading and representing, then a decent way to cut damages and prevent a future calamity is to refrain from voting for the following personality “types” who will, more than likely, not have the public’s optimum interest and, in the long run, will end up not working for the betterment of county, state and community goals.  Click here to read full published article…

If it looks good, you’ll see it. If it sounds good, you’ll hear it. If it’s marketed right, you’ll buy it. But… if it’s real, you’ll feel it. “ ~ Kid Rock   

Paul Ryan’s visit to Oakland University in Rochester Hills, MI on October 8th proved the words from homegrown rocker, Kid Rock, correct.  The Athletic Center Arena was rockin’ with an estimated 7000 screaming advocates who believe that Paul Ryan is, indeed, the ‘Real Deal’ in the 2012 race for the White House.

The concert-like atmosphere started with a cheerleading intro from Congresswoman, Candace Miller (MI-10) and then stump speeches from many Oakland County Republican candidates including the three B’s: Bill Bullard –County Clerk, Mike Bouchard – Sheriff, and Mike Bishop – Prosecutor warmed up to the audience generating much enthusiasm.  US Congressional candidates, Don Volaric (MI-9) and Kerry Bentivolio (MI-11), made some heartfelt pleas as well.  Senate candidate, Pete Hoekstra, also articulated why Michiganders should fire Sen. Debbie Stabenow and cast votes for him in this heated race.  MRP. Michigan Republican Chair Bobby Schostak ended the speaker round-up and vivaciously encouraged the crowd to get involved.

The new Republican anthem, “Born Free” started playing and kicked-off the main event with a humble talk from Kid Rock, A.K.A., Michigan’s own – Bob Ritchie…  Click to read full article

 

“Rather than joining the exodus of college graduates leaving the

State of Michigan for jobs in other states, I am staying here, to be

part of the solution. We need to get Michigan back to work by

reducing the cost of government, making Michigan more competitive

in attracting jobs and modernizing education for the 21st Century.

It will be my #1 priority to create a competitive climate for growth

and opportunity right here in Southeast Michigan.” ~ Brad Hantler

Brad Hantler is a young, dynamic candidate who is vying for the State Representative seat in the 39th  District of Michigan. (Wixom, Commerce Township, part of West Bloomfield.)  He is running as a reform candidate with his slogan – “moving Michigan forward” which caught the attention of former Presidential candidate, Herman Cain, who read Hantler’s recent article entitled: “It’s past time for part-time lawmakers” in the Oakland Press.   Cain was so impressed that he contacted Steve Hantler, Brad’s father and business acquaintance for years, endorsed Brad, and is now helping him raise money in MI.  A Pizza Fundraiser was held at The Library Pub in West Bloomfield on July 25, 2012 which cost patrons a mere $9.99 donation.  Click to read full article…

 

 

“Reinvesting in Michigan’s infrastructure is essential to growing Michigan’s economy and enhancing its quality of life. We’ve been beaten up for too many years. … We’ve become too negative … we’ve gotten caught up too much in a win-lose attitude. It is time for us to stand up as Michiganders and say here is a vision for the future, here is a plan, here is an attitude of action in a positive, forward-looking inclusive fashion. And by doing that, we will create more and better jobs, we will keep our young people here and will be a great state again.” ~ Governor Rick Snyder, MI
Governor Rick Snyder (MI) took quality time from his busy schedule to address the citizens of Port Huron in a town hall forum hosted by MI Senator Phil Pavlov, District 25, and the Blue Water Area Chamber of Commerce  last Friday, June 8, 2012. This stop was his first in the Blue Water area since taking office and was much anticipated. Over 500 citizens packed the McMorran arena to get the chance to query the Governor on some hot issues that have been on their minds. Click here to read full article….

 

As the Primary and General Elections are drawing near, I see so many mistakes being made by both seasoned politicians and neophytes.  This is part of my job as a Publicist and Political/Media consultant. There seems to be an epic wave of candidates lacking basic accountability and responsibility for their actions of late and it is truly astounding to watch as it is the equivalent of nails on the chalkboard for me.  Is this behavior societal, personal, a bit of both or a lame excuse in the sign of the times?  Below is a significant article written by Erika Anderson from Forbes.  She makes some good points and I encourage both candidates and their handlers to read:  ”Courageous Leaders Don’t Make Excuses…They Apologize”  to understand what true leadership is and what it is not…

I’ve been thinking about the power of apology lately.  I’ve been noticing that the people for whom I have the most respect don’t hesitate to say “I was wrong,” or “I’m sorry I…”  On the other hand, the people I have the hardest time respecting seem constitutionally unable to take responsibility for their own mistakes.  Even when they try, it comes out sounding like “I may have been partly at fault, but…” or “It may seem that I was wrong, but…”  They just can’t do it.

Apologizing freely requires a good deal of courage.  It’s not comfortable for any of us to admit an error, or to acknowledge that something we’ve done has caused others harm or inconvenience. So when someone truly apologizes, we know he or she is putting honesty and honor above personal comfort or self-protection.  It’s inspiring, and it feels brave.

I just today read a great article here on Forbes about this very topic called Creative Leadership: Humility and Being Wrong.  The authors, Doug Guthrie and Sudhir Venkatesh, make a really clear and well-reasoned case for the positive power of admitting and apologizing for one’s mistakes.  At one point in the article, they note that:

We are frequently taught that leaders, especially aspiring leaders, should hide weaknesses and mistakes. This view is flawed. It is not only good to admit you are wrong when you are; but also it can also be a powerful tool for leaders—actually increasing legitimacy and, when practiced regularly, can help to build a culture that actually increases solidarity, innovation, openness to change and many other positive features of organizational life.

I couldn’t agree more. Followers look to see whether a leader is courageous before they’ll fully accept that person’s leadership.  If they see courage (and taking full responsibility for actions and admitting and apologizing for mistakes are two of the five key indicators of courage), it feels safe to ‘sign up.’ People need courageous leaders in order to feel there’s someone to make the tough calls and to take responsibility for them – they need to know that the buck truly does stop with the leader. With a courageous leader, people feel protected – not that they’re helpless, but they know the person in charge really has their back.

And courage begets courage: your followers are more likely to make their own tough decisions and to take responsibility for them when you model that behavior.  You have their backs – so they’re much more likely to have yours.

Because so many of us have a hard time apologizing, I thought it might be helpful to have an ‘apology primer.’  Here you go:

  • I’m sorry: this is the core of a genuine apology.  “I’m sorry.” or “I apologize.”  It’s the stake in the ground to communicate that you truly regret your behavior and wish you had acted differently. No apology is complete without this.
  • Stay in the first person:  Many, perhaps most, apologies run off the rails at this point, when the apologizer shifts into the second person, e.g., “I’m sorry….you didn’t understand me.” Or “I’m sorry….you feel that way.” Suddenly, you’re no longer apologizing for your actions; you’re telling the other person that you regret their actions or feelings.  A true apology sounds like, “I’m sorry I….” or “I’m sorry we…”
  • Don’t equivocate:  Once you said what you regret about your actions or words, don’t water it down with excuses.  That can blow the whole thing.  The former manager of my apartment building once said to me, “I’m sorry we haven’t gotten back to you about your security deposit, but you have to understand we’ve got hundreds of tenants.”  I definitely didn’t feel apologized to – in fact, I felt he was telling me I was being inconsiderate to hold him accountable!  Just let the apology stand on its own. “I’m sorry we haven’t gotten back to you about your security deposit.
  • Say how you’ll fix it.  This seals the deal.  If you genuinely regret your words or actions, you’ll to commit to changing. This needs to be simple, feasible and specific. “I’m sorry we haven’t gotten back to you about your security deposit. We’ll have an answer to you by this Friday.”
  • Do it. I know some people who don’t have a hard time apologizing, but seem to have a hard time following through on their apologies. If you apologize and say you’re going to behave differently, and then don’t – it’s actually worse than not having apologized in the first place. When you don’t follow through, people question not only your courage, but also your trustworthiness.

So there you have it.  Next time you’re clearly in the wrong, take deep breath, put aside your self-justification, your excuses, your blame, your defensiveness, and simply apologize. Being courageous in this way is generally scary in anticipation. But it feels great once you’ve done it….to you, and to those you lead.

“There is a very easy way to return from a casino with a small fortune: go there with a large one.” ~ Jack Yelton

As the old adage goes, and most would agree – the House always wins. So why are casinos so popular despite the very high risk that is at stake? Does it make sense to build eight more of these enticing money havens in Michigan? A group called “Citizens (Committee) for more Michigan Jobs” is seeking to open eight new privately owned casinos in Michigan and has initiated a campaign to collect signatures in an effort to put its proposal before voters in November, 2012. Michigan already has 25 working casinos that span the entire region.
In a recent report from the AP, organizers note that winning statewide voter approval for casinos is not unprecedented. Michigan voters did just that in 1996, authorizing the three Detroit casinos that today form one of the nation’s biggest casino markets. The state also has 22 tribal-owned casinos, which combined with the Detroit gambling halls give Michigan a nearly $3 billion casino industry. Revenues for the Detroit casinos grew a combined 3 percent in 2011 and overall tribal casino business also is on the rise, helped by the new outlets
On April 3, 2012, the Board of State Canvassers approved the size, lettering and other physical features of petition forms that will be circulated by this organization. Citizens (Committee) for More Michigan Jobs needs to collect nearly 323,000 valid voter signatures to place its proposed constitutional amendment on the statewide ballot, and it also would need approval from local voters in each of the proposed casino locations. Click here to read more….

Take the poll and decide:

 

 

With the partial exceptions of health insurance and retirement benefits, We the People pay for the compensation of our elected representatives. We are literally their employers.  Here  is some info and stats to shed some light on this highly controversial topic in America.  Bottom line, it seems like our elected officials  get exponentially wealthy after being in office for years and this sad fact, to be fair, is not only due to their high salaries and benefits, but also due to a plethora of factors such as:  insider info, lobby/special interest favors,  corporate/banking kickbacks, etc…   Check out the following wage/benefits and realize that there is much hypocrisy regarding how much WE are paying these officials and the pittance of ROI WE are receiving from electing them to represent our best interests despite attempts at justifying the high salaries.  According to a recent Gallup poll in March, 2012, President Obama has a low 46% approval rating and 12 percent of Americans approve of the performance of Congress, and 82 percent give it a thumbs down.  Are their salaries justified with this low rating?

Annual Salary of retired US Presidents ………….$450,000 FOR LIFE

Presidential Pension Information

The retirement benefits received by former Presidents include a pension, Secret Service protection, and reimbursements for staff, travel, mail, and office expenses. The Presidential pension is not a fixed amount, rather it matches the current salary of Cabinet members (or Executive Level I personnel), which is $191,300/year as of March, 2008 (but see “Salary Info” section above for advice on how to track increases in this figure).

If you are interested in more information on presidential pensions, an excellent resource on former Presidents’ retirement benefits is the Congressional Research Service PDF document called Former Presidents: Federal Pension and Retirement Benefits by Stephanie Smith [CRS Report for Congress 98-249 GOV].

http://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/98-249.pdf

Also, according to the United States Secret Service: Frequently Asked Questions page, legislation that Congress passed in 1997 (Public Law 103-329) made President Clinton the last president to receive secret service protection for the rest of his life. George W. Bush and all presidents after him will receive protection for 10 years after they leave office. To see the bill, search THOMAS on the Library of Congress website for more information on H.R. 4539. (The GPO Access page for Public and Private Laws does not have online records that go back far enough.)

http://www.secretservice.gov/faq.shtml#faq9

Other federal officials, such as the Vice President, Cabinet members, and members of Congress do not have fixed salaries, but rather ones that can increase annually. These salaries are summed up for the years of 2003 to 2005 in an online document published by the Congressional Research Service called Salaries of Federal Officials by Barbara L. Schwemle [CRS Report for Congress 98-53 GOV].

http://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/98-53.pdf

Pension Information for Vice President and Other High Ranking Federal Officials

As with salaries, the rules governing the retirement benefits of the Vice President, Cabinet members, members of Congress and other federal officials are different than those that apply to the President, with benefits laid-out in the rules of the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) and the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS). Thus, their retirement benefits (including pensions) will vary from individual to individual, depending on factors such as years of service.

The following paragraph excerpted from the Congressional Research Service PDF document called Retirement Benefits for Members of Congress by Patrick J. Purcell [CRS Report RL30631] provides some idea of how much the pensions are for former Vice Presidents, Cabinet members, members of Congress and other federal officials. It provides averages for annual pensions given to retired members of Congress.

http://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/RL30631.pdf

http://uscode.house.gov/uscode-cgi/fastweb.exe?getdoc+uscview+t01t04+11163+15++)%20%20AND%20((3)%20ADJ%20USC)%3ACITE%20%20AND%20(CHAPTER%20ADJ%20(2))%3AEXPCITE

“As of October 1, 2006, 413 retired Members of Congress were receiving federal pensions based fully or in part on their congressional service. Of this number, 290 had retired under CSRS and were receiving an average annual pension of $60,972. A total of 123 Members had retired with service under both CSRS and FERS or with service under FERS only. Their average annual pension was $35,952 in 2006.”

These Office of Personnel Management webpages explain FERS and CSRS:

You can also look at the US Code on “Civil Service Retirement” (Title 5, Part III, Subpart G, Chapter 83, Subchapter III).

Information on rules governing the retirement benefits of members of the federal judicial system can be found in the US Code at 28 USC Sec. 627 (Title 28, Part III, Chapter 42, Section 627).

Note that former Vice Presidents (unlike former Presidents) did not receive Secret Service protection until 2008.  The U.S. Secret Service does not list them on either their Protective Mission page or their FAQ on “Who is the Secret Service authorized to protect?”.

http://www.secretservice.gov/protection.shtml

http://www.secretservice.gov/faq.shtml#faq2

A bill in 2008 by Congress (H.R. 5938) was passed and created specifically to amend Title 18 in the US Code so as to provide this protection to former Vice Presidents. Search THOMAS on the Library of Congress website for more information on H.R. 5938.  Former Vice President, Dick Cheney, received secret service protection six months after his tenure.
Annual Salary of House/Senate members ……….$174,000  + right to vote on increase FOR LIFE

Annual Salary of Speaker of the House ………….$223,500 + FOR LIFE

Annual Salary of Majority/Minority Leaders …..$193,400 +FOR LIFE

Annual Average salary of a soldier DEPLOYED IN AFGHANISTAN – $38,000
Annual Average income for seniors on SOCIAL SECURITY – $12,000

Our soldiers who protected and defended our liberty and freedom deserve a higher salary that is at least close to a public employee’s  salary/benefit package including  better health coverage.  Same goes for our seniors who have worked so hard during their lives only to receive a below the poverty line annual  SS income?   This is an outrage and so unfair!  All should agree that cuts should first be made  in our elected officials salaries and then continue on to other wasteful spending from there to mitigate the wage disparity that exists.  Until this happens, there is no rational reason for our elected officials to propose related bills that affect us whether it is raising taxes and increasing spending or cutting taxes and cutting spending!  This will not solve our massive money woes, however, it will, indeed, set an example.

An impromtu press conference in Troy, Michigan today at 12:00pm  —  The “Dele-Gate”  controversey is getting heated as GOP party officials and Rick Santorum supporters face-off in a debacle about party rules and principle that had many people in the Great Lakes State talking over their literal and figurative water coolers everywhere the past 48 hours – regardless if they were supporting Romney or Santorum or neither.

The Bru-ha-ha  started after the Michigan Republican Party’s Credentials Committee voted last night to award the state’s two at-large presidential nominating delegates to the Republican National Convention to Mitt Romney.   Click here to see Michigan’s Green Papers (2012 Presidential Primaries, Caucuses, and Conventions Rules).

The Detroit News reported that Rick Santorum’s grassroots supporters in Michigan are calling on state Republican Party leaders to reverse their decision to award two statewide delegates to Mitt Romney in Tuesday’s presidential primary.

The GOP credentials committee’s 4-2 decision Wednesday gave Michigan native Romney a 16-14 victory over Santorum, a former Pennsylvania senator who believes he and Romney actually tied for delegates. Romney beat Santorum in the popular vote, 41 percent to 38 percent.

But, Santorum’s campaign argues the two statewide delegates should be split up based on an earlier understanding of the primary rules.

During the  press conference at Santorum’s former headquarters in Troy, his supporters predicted there would be hell to pay for GOP leaders if they don’t reconsider their decision to award Romney the delegate win.

Check out the following links, watch the G1NBC video of the press conference and then take the poll to decide for yourself as to which side is right.

The gloves are off  in the mitten as this “Dele-Gate” saga continues… Hopefully, this conflict does not set the precedent for the manner in which remaining states and the four candidate will handle their primaries/caucus’ in the coming months.

A convoluted mess for sure.  There are truths on both sides.  Perhaps, when the meeting minutes are revealed, we can put this issue to rest and move onward…

Read the MSNBC report with audio from Michigan Republican Party… 

http://www.thatssaulfolks.com/2012/03/01/saul-anuziss-statement-on-michigans-delegate-allocation/

February 7th Memo from the Credentials Committee

March 1st Memo Michigan Delegate Allocation Republican National Convention

 

 

 

The OCRP Lincoln Day Dinner with Presidential candidate, Rick Santorum as keynote speaker was a smashing success last evening, February 16, 2012!  Please check out the review with video and take the following poll regarding Michigan’s Primary to take place on February 28, 2012…  Thank you!  :-)

 

 

“Approximately 40 percent of U.S. voters identify as independents, giving them considerable clout with political candidates.  ~  Clarence Page

Who really makes up the independent electorate whose influence is sometimes overstated and overrated?  Do the bulk of Independent voters merely hide behind their “Indie” status due to being disgruntled with their affiliated party?  Or, are these sought-after breed of  citizens just “swing voters” who sway back and forth with an occasional walk on the other side?

Voters are a tough bunch to satisfy these days. The number of people who are registered to vote as Democrat or Republican has plunged by 2.5 million since 2008, according to a new tally. Independent ranks have grown. Still, studies show, most independents still vote overwhelmingly for one party or the other, even if they don’t want to admit that in public.

Both parties have been losing members to the independent column since at least the 1960s. Among other reasons, television and suburbanization increasingly have liberated voters from reliance on precinct captains and other party favors.

Americans increasingly like to believe that we vote for the individual or for ideas, not the party. Considering the various scoundrels who give both parties a bad name from time to time, I understand.

That would help explain the 2.5 million defections uncovered in a USA Today analysis. Registered Democrats still outnumber other categories, with more than 42 million people, compared with 30 million Republicans and 24 million independents. But the Dems also have lost the most — 1.7 million since 2008.

And in the eight swing states that register voters by party — Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina and Pennsylvania — Democrats’ registration is down by 800,000 and Republicans’ by 350,000. Independents have gained 325,000.

Obama won all of those eight states in his 2008 landslide, but polls and party insiders say they’re mostly up for grabs in 2012. As North Carolina elections director Gary Bartlett told USA Today, the 2012 winner will be “whoever is attractive to the unaffiliated voter.” Or, at least, so goes the conventional wisdom.

But, maybe not. Most self-declared independents I know also make it pretty clear which side of the left-right divide they’re on. That observation is backed up by election scholars. Increasingly, the academics are challenging not only the independence of independent swing voters, but even the cherished notion that independents determine election outcomes.

In a groundbreaking 1992 book, “The Myth of the Independent Voter,” authors Bruce E. Keith, David B. Magleby, Candice J. Nelson and Elizabeth Orr found that most self-identified independents were “closet partisans.” They tend to think like and vote mostly for one of the two major parties. Over time, only about 10 percent strayed across party lines enough to be called truly “independent” of either major party.

And in a further blow to independent pride, the authors found, those who actually vote the most independently also tend to be the least informed about what and whom they are voting for. (Cheer up, my fellow self-declared independent voters. The very fact that you are reading this column indicates that you probably are not part of that sadly underinformed crowd.)

More recent data from the American National Election Study analyzed by political science professor Alan I. Abramowitz of Emory University show that in 2008, independents made up 40 percent of eligible voters, but only 33 percent of those who actually voted. Only 7 percent of the total voted as true independents with no party preference. The other indies were clearly “leaners” for one party or the other.

Nor do independents necessarily determine the outcomes of presidential elections, especially when the final count is close, Abramowitz writes in the Crystal Ball blog of political science professor Larry Sabato at the University of Virginia’s website. In fact, he argues, in all three of the presidential elections since 1972 that were decided by a margin of less than five points, the candidate chosen by the most independent voters lost the popular vote.

His examples: When Jimmy Carter won the overall popular vote in 1976, most independents voted for Gerald Ford. In 2000, most independents voted for George W. Bush, but Al Gore won the overall popular vote, despite losing the Electoral College. And in 2004 most independents voted for John Kerry, but George W. Bush won the overall popular vote.

Yet, I suspect that there’s another reason that more people are calling themselves independents these days. They’re hoping that someday if there are enough independents, they might create a third party. Perhaps, but considering the wide diversity of views held by independents now, their wishes won’t be easy for a third party to satisfy either.”

All in all, most people including the Indies, themselves, like to think that  an Independent voter is someone who chooses a candidate based on their qualifications and issues rather than what letter is next to their name…  hmmmmmmm……

 

“The debates are part of the unconscionable fraud that our political campaigns have become – a format that defies meaningful discourse. They should be charged with sabotaging the electoral process.” ~  Walter Cronkite

Is this seasoned iconic journalist correct?  Are the Presidential debates really giving us the information we require in short soundbites?  Please read my current recap of the tenth GOP Presidential Debate which took place at Oakland University in Rochester, MI. last night on November 9, 2011.

Take the Poll: What Grade Do You Give the CNBC Presidential Debate in Michigan?

 

 

 

My good friend, Edward J. Robinson, recently authored the book: ‘While the Eagle Sleeps’

     “’While the Eagle Sleeps’ is a call to action,” according to former Michigan Governor William G. Milliken. “And it’s a compelling must read for all Americans who yearn for a better life and want to know how to make it happen.”

Author,  Edward J. Robinson, 77, a former Michigan State Senator writes a 154-page eye opener. ‘While the Eagle Sleeps’ is divided into five sections: Corporations without Borders; Moneyism not Capitalism; An Unhealthy Health Industry; A Government for the People and Let the Eagle Soar.  Consider ‘While the Eagle Sleeps’ a guide to restoring America’s greatness.

His no holds barred approach informs Americans that their center of the social class food chain is on the verge of extinction.

“People see things through different eyes at different times.  My thoughts and proposals are not radical.  Rather, I am just suggesting that we learn from our history, that we repeat our successes and correct the mistakes,” Robinson said.

Whether you are a Republican, Democrat, Independent or non-political – you will appreciate the history, problems, statistics and honest opinions/solutions for our decaying society that are well contrived in this book and will be fodder for intelligent discussion.  Mr. Robinson is a well-rounded, blatantly honest and pro-active individual who has lived a very intriguing life.

‘While the Eagle Sleeps’ was released in both hard and soft covers, it retails for $23.99 (hard back) and $20 (paperback).  The publisher is World Audience, Inc., New York, www.worldaudience.org.  The book is available at Amazon.com as well as most major book retailers.

If you reside near New York City, Mr. Robinson will be speaking and signing books tomorrow, October 28, 2011 at NYIT from 11am – 6pm.  Stop on by to meet this jovial and interesting man with a very eclectic past.

 

 

 

 


According to a breaking news report, Facebook has filed paperwork to set up a Political Action Committee. Facebook is looking to help its friends reach high places by setting up a political action committee (PAC) to fund candidates in 2012, ABC News reported Tuesday. Is this maneuver really in the best interest of “The Social Network’ and its almost a billion users?

The social networking giant, which has 800 million users, filed the PAC paperwork this week.

The PAC “will give our employees a way to make their voice heard in the political process by supporting candidates who share our goals of promoting the value of innovation to our economy while giving people the power to share and make the world more open and connected,” Facebook spokesman Andrew Noyes told The Washington Post.

The move follows PACs being set up by a number of other tech giants, including Google and Microsoft.

Google employees have donated $570,000 to their PAC this year, the Post reported, with CEO Larry Page contributing the maximum $5,000 amount to the fund.

Microsoft employees have contributed $722,000 to the company’s PAC.

Tech companies have also hosted a number of political events recently, strengthening their ties to Washington.

Last week’s FOX News Republican presidential debate was co-sponsored by Google and on Monday Facebook hosted a town hall-style meeting with three House Republican leaders.

LinkedIn also hosted a town hall event with President Barack Obama on Monday.

Take the Poll: Should large ‘Social Network’ conglomerates form PACs with unlimited funding for preferred candidates or political parties?

 

***  I apologize for the absence of content on this blog for over three weeks as I have been in the hospital and am now recovering from a chronic condition.  When energy and strength permit, I will try to deliver meaningful content to the best of my ability.  Thank you everyone for your understanding, caring, patience and thoughts & prayers. ***

 

While OUR economy continues to tank,  jobs continue to disappear, national debt is meteorically increasing, GDP is low, Gov’t is spending like drunken sailors with worthless money and OUR legislators and President continue to hold us hostage – WE CAN  make a difference starting now by simply making some changes in our daily/weekly purchases…

Recently, Diane Sawyer from ABC did a report on typical American spending habits related to imported items. The team removed ALL items from a typical, middle class family’s home that were not made in the USA .

There was hardly anything left besides the kitchen sink. Literally. During the special they showed truckloads of items – USA made – being brought in to replace everything and talked about how to find these items and the difference in price etc..

It was interesting that Diane Sawyer said that if every American spent just $64 more than normal on USA made items this year, it would create something like 200,000 new jobs!

Some sources claim that while shopping at WALMART they found that ON THE LABEL OF SOME PRODUCE AND CANNED FOOD ITEMS WERE LABELED ‘FROM CHINA ‘

FOR EXAMPLE, THE “OUR FAMILY” BRAND OF THE MANDARIN ORANGES SAYS RIGHT ON THE CAN ‘FROM CHINA ‘

THIS IS SHOCKING –  SO, FOR A FEW MORE CENTS, A SHOPPER CAN BUY THE LIBERTY GOLD BRAND OR THE DOLE SINCE IT’S FROM CALIFORNIA.

Are we Americans as dumb as we appear — or — is it that we just do not think. The Chinese, knowingly and intentionally, export inferior and even toxic products and dangerous toys and goods to be sold in American markets.

70% of Americans believe that the trading privileges afforded to the Chinese should be suspended.

Why do you need the government to suspend trading privileges? DO IT YOURSELF, AMERICA !!

Simply look on the bottom of every product you buy, and if it says ‘Made in China ‘ or ‘PRC’ (and that now includes Hong Kong ), simply choose another product, or none at all. You will be amazed at how dependent you are on Chinese products, and you will be equally amazed at what you can do without.

Who needs plastic eggs to celebrate Easter? If you must have eggs, use real ones and benefit some American farmer. Easter is just an example. The point is do not wait for the government to act Just go ahead and assume control on your own.

THINK ABOUT THIS: If 200 million Americans each refuse to buy just $20 of Chinese goods, that’s a billion dollar trade imbalance resolved in our favor…fast!!

Most of the people who have been reading about this matter are planning on implementing this on Aug. 1st and continue it until Sept. 1st. That is only one month of trading losses, but it will hit the Chinese for 1/12th of the total, or 8%, of their American exports. Then, perhaps, they might have to ask themselves if the benefits of their arrogance and lawlessness were worth it.

Remember,  August 1st to Sept. 1st –  BUY AMERICAN AND SUPPORT THIS GREAT COUNTRY – START NOW!  Then, continue this new habit so WE the PEOPLE can make a determined difference in the sad state of our domestic affairs. :-)

Hotline/zazzle.com

MEMPHIS, TN –  Mayor AC Wharton and other city officials soon will have a direct line to decision makers in Washington.

Memphis is one of six cities chosen for a White House pilot project called “Strong Cities, Strong Communities,” designed to allow local officials to dictate what they need from the federal government, said John Porcari, deputy secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation, who was in Memphis for the announcement Monday.

“We bend programs to fit local needs, not the other way around,” Porcari said. “It’s a bottom-up approach instead of a top-down approach.”

Amos Maki  reported that the program will embed federal officials inside city government. Representatives from the departments of Education, Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, Health and Human Services, Justice, Treasury, Labor and the Small Business Administration will live and work in Memphis as part of the project.

“We have people across the federal government clamoring to be a part of this,” said Porcari.

The other cities included in the project are Detroit; Chester, Pa.; Fresno, Calif.; Cleveland, Ohio and New Orleans. All six have been hard-hit by the recession.

HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan said Monday in Detroit that the pilot cities were selected on the basis of economic need, local leadership, potential for economic growth and geographic diversity.

Detroit Mayor Dave Bing said he’s excited to receive a different kind of investment from the U.S. government — human capital — rather than the monetary funding that in the past hasn’t always been managed efficiently by city leaders.

“One of the things that’s happened historically with Detroit is that we’ve gotten financial support and we’ve not managed the finances very, very well,” Bing said.

Valerie Jarrett, senior adviser to President Barack Obama, said on a conference call that the program is “not a new grant funding program, but a new way of working together.” The program will be tailored around each city’s individual needs, she added.

Melody Barnes, domestic policy director for the president, added: “We’re providing assistance and support, not a mandate.”

In Memphis, Porcari met with local business officials Monday afternoon and got a tour of the FedEx World Headquarters.

The city’s Office of Talent and Human Capital, under director Douglas Scarboro, helped spearhead Memphis’ inclusion in the program.

“As a result of this distinction, Memphis will have the support of a federal implementation team to actualize strategies for making Memphis a city of choice,” Scarboro said.

The office was created in 2010 by Wharton to help attract or retain talented professionals.

“With the major activities in cities — education, health care, transportation, housing — all driven by federal policy, we must develop strategies that coordinate efforts, reduce bureaucracy, avoid duplication, and make it easier to link up with federal government in a way that ensures efficiency and accountability,” Wharton said.


–The Associated Press contributed to this article.

 

This video displays just a mere sampling of the devastation brought on the past two years, unfortunately.  Facts cannot be denied as OUR country is, indeed, in peril….  :(



L. Brooks Patterson and Cassie Sobelton, DMC/Susan Tabar images

(Troy, MICHIGAN) – The Detroit Medical Center (DMC) and Oakland County Executive, L. Brooks Patterson hosted a complimentary after work soiree to search for the best of the best of the OC young professionals on June 13th at upscale, nu-Asian restaurant, Mon Jin Lau. This marked yet another one of Brook’s avant-garde incentives to reach out to the young movers and shakers of Oakland County.  The hot pursuit will continue with related events planned for the rest of the year.  Over 200 attendees mixed and mingled in the tropic room and on the patio on a beautiful, dry sunny day discussing the issues of Oakland County, Michigan as a whole and the upcoming Presidential election in 2012.

Brook’s intent is to honor 40 young Oakland County professionals and executive leaders who have achieved success and excellence in their field before the age of 40.  His purpose is to seek people who have demonstrated outstanding leadership, initiative and dedication in pursuing their careers, as well as in their communities.  The after-work party proved successful as many met the high-standards and criteria that Brook’s cherishes.

 

The best of the best of the ‘fab forty’ will introduce Brooks at his 2012 State of the County address and receive a year long pass to all of Brooks’ 2012 fundraising events. Second place will receive passes to Brooks’ 2012 black tie birthday celebration, 2012 St. Patrick’s Day party and 2012 golf outing.  Third, fourth and fifth place will receive passes to Brooks’ 2012 black tie birthday celebration. All chosen as Brook’s Elite Forty Under 40 will be recognized and invited to attend Brooks’ 2012 State of the County address.  In addition, they will be featured on lbrookspatterson.com.

L. Brooks Patterson/ Susan Tabar images

Nominees must be younger than the age of 40 as of February 7, 2012.

 

Nominations must be received by 11:59 PM on Wednesday, November 2, 2011, and will be reviewed by the judging committee on the basis of the data received and measured against the criteria contained therein.

L. Brooks Patterson is one of the most successful leaders in the Nation serving his fifth four-year term as Oakland County Executive after winning re-election in 2008 by another large electoral margin. As the chief elected official in one of America’s most affluent and progressive counties, Mr. Patterson presides over a nearly $780 million dollar recommended annual budget for FY2011 and a county workforce of nearly 4,000 full and part time benefit eligible employees.

Just a few of the innovative programs Mr. Patterson has launched include:

  • Three Year Balanced Budget
  • Mandarin Chinese taught in most school districts due to China’s emergence as a world economic power..
  • Emerging Sectors Initiative which identifies the top 10 emerging business sectors.
  • Count Your Steps pedometer walking program to target childhood obesity.
  • Successful Health Care Cost Containment Initiative which makes OC the first county in America to have fully funded employee and retiree health care while saving taxpayers over $150 million.
  • OakFit  wellness program which combats health care costs and includes health screenings for early detection of chronic health issues and lunchtime healthy lifestyle activities for employees.
  • Medical Main Street  which is a new initiative designed to make Oakland County a “medical tourism” destination by attracting patients, investment, medical supplies and clinical research from around the world.
  • Economic Growth Alliance –  A collaboration among Oakland, Genesee, Livingston, St. Clair, and soon Macomb counties on joint opportunities for economic growth, diversification and legislation that may impact the region.
  • Technology – Oakland County named among the most digitally advanced in the nation in the Digital Counties Survey of Counties over 500,000 in population by the Center for Digital Government and the National Association of Counties (NACo).
  • Automation Alley – Southeast Michigan’s premier high-tech consortium .

 

These are just a mere sampling  of the cutting-edge initiatives that L. Brooks Patterson has and continues to develop and manage.  His quest for the best young professionals continues…  For additional information on this program or other related incentives, events or policy issues, please check out Brooks on Twitter: http://twitter.com//BrooksPatterson YouTube:   http://www.youtube.com/lbrookspatterson or visit his website @ http://lbrookspatterson.com for the latest Oakland county happenings.

 

“We have to get to a place where every part of our society is cognizant of the kinds of threats that are out there, and empowered to take some common sense steps to counter that.” – Janet Napolitano

Homeland Security head, Janet Napolitano, continued her campus tour in a recent stop at NYU Law School where she gave a speech about the state of security as we approach the 10-year anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, and following the announced death of Osama bin Laden.
In the video below Napolitano lays out a sweeping surveillance agenda that includes citizen spies who have a mission of “shared responsibility” to thwart “Core” al-Qaeda, foreign groups “inspired by” al-Qaeda, as well as domestic “extremist” groups, which apparently include an increasing number of plots by U.S. citizens.  She added that “there is no single portrait” of today’s potential terrorist, citing recruiting tactics “including Hip Hop videos, if you can imagine that.”  And, naturally, cyberspace. Each of the four key ways that she stated as critical to Homeland Security’s mission will widen the Stasi-style network of unpaid employees of the State virtually deputized to spy on their neighbor in the private and public sector and issue reports to the DHS federal security matrix.

  1. Strengthen the nation’s 72 fusion centers, which coordinate with local police, businesses, churches, universities and more in a cooperative effort to federalize local communities.
  2. Continue the expanded use of Suspicious Activity Reports (SAR), initially used for IRS reporting and for businesses to alert government officials to large cash purchases at their establishments.  The new initiative will cover all sectors that will share back to DHS.
  3. Launch the National Terrorism Advisory System to replace the general color-coded terror alert system and set up a “base level” high risk, which will be augmented with specific messages.  One component of this new system that she does not address is that it will be directed toward the individual by utilizing a text messaging system, as well as social networks to issue government statements and warnings (or propaganda).
  4. Continue expansion of a national “If You See Something, Say Something” campaign that began with the NY Metropolitan Transit Authority, and kicked off at private businesses likeWal-Mart whereby people can receive ongoing messages via telescreens in government buildings, private businesses and public areas, then report on anyone for any reason without consequence for false reports.

She also predictably suggests that the counter-terrorism apparatus is a useful tool that can save citizens in need of rescue from natural disasters.  ”More likely, it is the roll-out of soft martial law that will create a permanent state of fear, suspicion, false arrests, police brutality, and the end of the American republic in the same fashion that led to the end of every society that chose the path of security over freedom.”  Jason Rink TLV

This saga continues….

 

“The unions claim the deck is stacked against them when it comes to labor laws, but the truth is many private and public sector workers are forced to pay union dues as a condition of their employment, yet they have little say in how the unions spend their money.” ~ Linda Chavez

Can the recent Government control of the successful American company, Boeing, happen to the ‘Big Three’  or any other manufacturing company in Michigan?  Will MI workers ever be free of the proverbial Union chains that bind them like slaves to the factions that greedily promote their false betterment and supposed general welfare?  When Governor Rick Snyder created his policy/budget proposal, he forgot to list the ‘right to work’ issue as a priority and many are baffled as to why this important matter is not on his agenda at all.  While the Governor’s mission has been efficient and prudent thus far, many are wondering why his focus is now clearly getting approval for the new bridge across the Detroit River to Canada?   The notorious  bridge battle  seemingly  pales in comparison to maintaining the fundamental freedom of choice pertaining to employees in Michigan’s kingdom of unions that have contributed to the demise of the once vibrant ‘Great Lakes’ State….

Click to read full article – more of this  sad tale of Atlas Shrugging…

Take the poll :

Would Michigan be better off if it changed its status to “Right to Work???”





SEATTLE – The two-track recovery is now in danger precisely because of its dual nature. Track one includes record corporate profits, record cash on hand in corporate treasuries, too-big-to-fail banks fully restored, CEO compensation back in the stratosphere. Larger companies that survived the Great Recession are for the most part stronger than ever. Tech sectors are booming. Much of manufacturing had been recovering. Wall Street rallied. China, critically, rebounded strongly, helping trade.

But track two was a very different journey: Housing collapse without end, real unemployment around 16 percent and poor levels of job creation, stagnant or falling real wages, small businesses that had hung on through the worst of the downturn remain at a tipping point, a record number of Americans on food stamps and other forms of government assistance, community banks continuing to struggle, state and local fiscal troubles. Most productivity-enhancing infrastructure projects remain in the study phase. And most of the global imbalances involving debt and trade persist, instead of being worked out by the Great Recession. The economy has not reset in a healthy, sustainable way.

At some point, unless the persistent recessionary track healed and aligned with the recovery track, the whole thing was going to come off the rails. Now signs are growing that this may be happening.

Housing has fallen into a double-dip downturn. Growth was ominously weak in the first quarter and a growing number of economists expect more of the same in the second — this means we lack the growth to create large numbers of jobs. The Obama stimulus, never deployed well to make up for the GDP drop of the recession, is running out. Signs of a slowdown in China are emerging. No wonder, then, that ADP reports that only 38,000 jobs were created in May and the Institute for Supply Management’s latest report showed an abrupt slowdown in manufacturing as well.

The Seattle area has generally recovered better than most other metros, but unemployment persists and many small businesses are on the edge. As we learned last time, the longer an economic problem persists the more likely it will land here with a nasty thud.

The political games over the debt ceiling aren’t helping. But neither is the fact that the largest banks and the hedge fund boyz are making most of their profits from trading and other risky Wall Street casino games, instead of deploying capital into productive, job-creating enterprises.

To make it real simple for the boyz cooking up their latest financial “innovations”: No recovery of good jobs, no real recovery.

Today’s Econ Haiku

Amazon, Gaga
A profitable pairing
Singing to the bank

by Jon Talton

 

This humorous satirical re-make of the popular “Candyman” tune from the 70s by Tim Hawkins really says it all. Sad, but, unfortunately true. Turn up the volume and enjoy the show… :-)

 

Did the 1979 hit “London Calling” by The Clash have a prophetic message to the modern-day world???

If for no other reason, America must know, understand, comprehend, value and deal with what our friends, our allies, our partners in global governance, the people in this Global world, think of us and why. Is this acceptable? Do we analyze and pivot or do we shoot the messenger? How quickly we forget….

 

On Foreign Relations
The American people can now more readily ‘understand’ why the Obama’s were omitted from the guest list to the Royal wedding in April!
This is worth reading. We know how other countries feel about us. Hopefully we can change all this. Now we will see why some of the other ‘friendly’ nations really don’t like us now.

This is reportedly from the “London Daily Telegraph” Editor. This is a very sobering article. Our handling of relationships with the Britons over the oil spill won’t help either.

From The London Daily Telegraph Editor On Foreign Relations.

Quote: “Let me be clear: I’m not normally in favor of boycotts, and I love the American people.  I holiday in their country regularly, and hate the tedious snobby sneers against the United States.  But the American people chose to elect an idiot who seems hell bent on insulting their allies, and something must be done to stop Obama’s reckless foreign policy, before he does the dirty on his allies on every issue.”

One of the most poorly kept secrets in Washington is President Obama’s animosity toward Great Britain, presumably because of what he regards as its sins while ruling Kenya (1895-1963).

One of Barack Hussein Obama’s first acts as president was to return to Britain a bust of Winston Churchill that had graced the Oval Office since 9/11.  He followed this up by denying Prime Minister Gordon Brown, on his first state visit, the usual joint press conference with flags.

The president was “too tired” to grant the leader of America’s closest ally a proper welcome, his aides told British journalists.

Mr. Obama followed this up with cheesy gifts for Mr. Brown and the Queen. Columnist Ian Martin described his behavior as “rudeness personified.” There was more rudeness in store for Mr. Brown at the opening session of the United Nations in September.  “The prime minister was forced to dash through the kitchens of the UN in New York to secure five minutes of face time with President Obama after five requests for a sit down meeting were rejected by the White House,” said London Telegraph columnist David Hughes.  “Mr. Obama’s “churlishness is unforgivable,” Mr. Hughes said.

The administration went beyond snubs and slights last week when Secretary of State Hillary Clinton endorsed the demand of Argentine President Cristina Kirchner, a Hugo Chavez ally, for mediation of Argentina’s specious claim to the Falkland Islands, a British dependency since 1833. The “people who live in the Falklands, who speak English, want nothing to do with Argentina.” When, in 1982, an earlier Argentine dictatorship tried to seize the Falklands by force, the British — with strong support from President Ronald Reagan — expelled them.

“It is truly shocking that Barack Obama has decided to disregard our shared history,” wrote Telegraph columnist Toby Young. “Does Britain’s friendship really mean so little to him?”  “One could ask, does the friendship of anyone in the entire world mean anything to him?”

“I recently asked several senior administration officials, separately, name a foreign leader with whom Barack Obama has forged a strong personal relationship during his first year in office,” wrote Jackson Diehl, deputy editorial page editor of the Washington Post, on Monday. “A lot of hemming and hawing ensued.”  One official named French President Nicolas Sarkozy, but his contempt for Mr. Obama is an open secret. Another named German Chancellor Angela Merkel. But, said Mr. Diehl, “Merkel too has been conspicuously cool toward Obama.”

Mr. Obama certainly doesn’t care about the Poles and Czechs, whom he has  betrayed on missile defense.  Honduras” and “Israel” also can attest that he’s been an unreliable ally and an unfaithful friend.  Ironically, our relations with both Israel and the Palestinian Authority have never been worse.  “Russia” “has offered nothing in exchange for Mr. Obama’s abandonment of missile defense”.  Russia and China won’t support serious sanctions on Iran.  Syria’s support for terrorism has not diminished despite efforts to normalize diplomatic relations. The reclusive military dictatorship that runs Burma has responded to our efforts at “engagement” by deepening its ties to North Korea.

And the Chinese make little effort to disguise their contempt for him.

“For the first time in a long time, the President of the United States is actually distrusted by its allies and not in the least feared by its  adversaries”.  Nor is Mr. Obama now respected by the majority of Americans. Understandably focused on the dismal economy and Mr. Obama’s relentless efforts to nationalize and socialize health care, Americans apparently have yet to notice his dismal performance and lack of respect in the world community. They soon will.”
London Daily Telegraph editor — Alex Singleton

 

In the aftermath of bin Laden’s killing, many questions still remain…

According to the official story, Osama bin Laden was killed because he resisted the Navy SEALs who were attempting to capture him at his hideaway in Abbottabad, Pakistan. “If we had the opportunity to take him alive,” John Brennan, the president’s counterterrorism adviser, said on Monday, “we would have done that.”
Does it matter? Evidently the Obama administration thinks it does. But such fastidiousness seems inconsistent with the president’s policy regarding terrorism suspects who are not in custody, which is to shoot first and never ask questions.
Under the laws of war, which the administration says apply to members and supporters of Al Qaeda, you are not supposed to shoot an enemy combatant who is attempting to surrender or summarily execute him after he has been captured. Yet it is OK to kill him from a distance, without offering him a chance to give up.
In fact, President Obama considered dropping a bomb on Bin Laden’s house but decided on a helicopter raid instead because he wanted to preserve the Al Qaeda leader’s body to confirm that he was dead. “The helicopter raid was riskier,” an administration official told Politico. “But he wanted proof. He didn’t want to just leave a pile of rubble.”

Although the helicopter raid was riskier for American personnel, a bomb would have been riskier for innocent civilians in the house and the neighborhood. But it would have avoided any question of whether Bin Laden could have been taken alive by foreclosing that option.
Notably, several news outlets called the killing of Bin Laden, who reportedly was shot twice in the head at close range, an “assassination,” suggesting they doubted the official account of the raid. Assassination is banned by an executive order that is still in force, although the Bush and Obama administrations have interpreted the term narrowly, to exclude targeted killings of terrorists.
The assassination ban, first imposed by Gerald Ford in 1976, grew out of an investigation by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence that highlighted CIA plots to kill government officials in Cuba, Vietnam, the Congo, the Dominican Republic, and Chile. Hence everyone agrees the order forbids deliberately killing foreign heads of state, a practice that is also condemned by international law.

This distaste for assassination can lead to morally puzzling results. The day of the raid in Abbottabad, the Libyan government accused NATO forces of trying to assassinate Muammar al-Qaddafi after an air attack killed one of his sons and three of his grandchildren. NATO officials said the complex it bombed was a command post as well as a residence and therefore a legitimate military target. They denied any intent to kill Qaddafi.
Which is worse: deliberately killing a brutal dictator or accidentally killing little children? It is a perverse policy that forbids the assassination of foreign leaders, even those guilty of mass murder, yet sanctions the slaughter of innocent noncombatants as unavoidable “collateral damage.”
Qaddafi, like Bin Laden, has plenty of innocent blood on his hands. But he receives special consideration because his victims include not only the targets of terrorist attacks (such as the 1986bombing of a Berlin disco and the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland) but also the Libyans he rules by force.
By contrast, anyone other than a government official is fair game if President Obama identifies him as a terrorist. Obama claims the authority to deal death from a distance anywhere in the world, since the whole planet is a battlefield in the war with Al Qaeda.

“The problem is that some people on Obama’s list, which includes U.S. citizens as well as foreign nationals, may not be as indisputably guilty as Osama bin Laden, who was proud of his role in murdering thousands of Americans. In a conventional war, the enemy is the guy in a uniform shooting at you. In the war with Al Qaeda, the enemy is whoever the president says he is.” ~ Jacob Sullum, Creators Syndicate Inc.

 

 

As reported by CNS News, In what the White House calls a push for transparency, a pending executive order would require companies doing business with the federal government to disclose political contributions to independent groups, but would not place the same requirement on public employee unions or federal grant recipients that typically donate to Democrats.

Entitled the “Disclosure of Political Spending By Government Contractors,” the order would implement parts of the DISCLOSE Act, which failed to get through Congress last year. The legislation sought to restrict campaign speech after the landmark Citizens United vs. Federal Elections Commission U.S. Supreme Court ruling that upheld the right of corporations and unions to donate to campaigns.

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney confirmed Monday that work is underway on the draft order, and linked the move to President Obama’s stated commitment to transparency.

“It’s fully acknowledged that there is a process underway; a draft is just that,” Carney told CNSNews.com. “It could change as it makes its way through the process. But what the president is committed to is transparency, and he certainly thinks that the American taxpayer should know where his or her money is going.  So I — this is part of the President’s commitment to transparency.”

Government contractors are already required to disclose contributions to political candidates. This executive order would require the disclosure of any donations to independent groups, where conservative groups outspent liberal ones in the 2010 election.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said the executive order would stifle free speech.

“Democracy is compromised when individuals and small businesses fear reprisal, or expect favor from the federal government as a result of their political associations,” McConnell said in a statement last week, after reports of the draft emerged.

“So recent press reports about an unprecedented draft Executive Order raise troubling concerns about an effort to silence or intimidate political adversaries’ speech through the government contracting system,” he said. “If true, the proposed effort would represent an outrageous and anti-democratic abuse of executive branch authority. No administration should use the federal contracting system for campaign purposes.”

The DISCLOSE Act was pushed by Sen. Charles Schumer (D.-N.Y.), and Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.). Announcing the bill at a Feb. 11, 2010 press conference, Schumer said that its provisions “will make them [corporations] think twice before spending unlimited sums to influence elections. The deterrent effect should not be underestimated.”

 

Supreme CourtThe Supreme Court justices at the 2010 State of the Union address, as President Obama criticized the court’s campaign finance ruling. (Image: Network coverage screenshot)

 

Hans A. von Spakovsky, senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, was skeptical of Carney’s assertion that the president was merely committed to transparency.

“If transparency is the true goal, why isn’t the proposed executive order covering any outside entity that gets federal money? It only applies to government contractors, not grant recipients like Planned Parenthood,” he told CNSNews.com. “Public employee unions are also exempt from this order.”

Von Spakovsky, who was the first to report the existence of the draft executive order, on Pajamas Media last week, argued that the move would politicize the federal procurement process.

He is also troubled by the use of an executive order in this instance.

“This threatens the representational system,” he said. “The president wants to implement through the regulatory process what failed in Congress.”

The draft executive order would require government contractors to disclose:

– “All contributions or expenditures to or on behalf of federal candidates, parties or party committees made by the bidding entity, its directors or officers, or any affiliates or subsidiaries within its control.”

– “Any contributions made to third party entities with the intention or reasonable expectation that parties would use those contributions to make independent expenditures or electioneering communications.”

Obama has long railed against the Citizens United ruling. During his 2010 State of the Union speech he launched a verbal offensive against the Supreme Court, prompting a visible response from Justice Samuel Alito, who along with his colleagues were seated just feet from the podium.

 

 

 

Unfortunately,  ’common sense’ has turned into ‘common cents’  and/or ‘empty brain syndrome’ at a meteoric rate in the society in which we live.  Unless we strive to get back to the three R’s (Reason, Rationality, Responsibility) of  mindful thinking,  WE will continue the downward spiral of desparity on all levels.

 

Here is a symbolic Obituary printed in the London Times – Interesting and sadly - rather true..

Today we mourn the passing of a beloved old friend, Common Sense, who
has been with us for many years. No one knows for sure how old he was,
since his birth records were long ago lost in bureaucratic red tape. He
will be remembered as having cultivated such valuable lessons as:
- Knowing when to come in out of the rain;
- Why the early bird gets the worm;
- Life isn’t always fair;
- and Maybe it was my fault.

Common Sense lived by simple, sound financial policies (don’t spend
more than you can earn) and reliable strategies (adults, not children,
are in charge).

His health began to deteriorate rapidly when well-intentioned but
overbearing regulations were set in place. Reports of a 6-year-old boy
charged with sexual harassment for kissing a classmate; teens suspended
from school for using mouthwash after lunch; and a teacher fired for
reprimanding an unruly student, only worsened his condition.

Common Sense lost ground when parents attacked teachers for doing the
job that they themselves had failed to do in disciplining their unruly
children.

It declined even further when schools were required to get parental
consent to administer sun lotion or an aspirin to a student; but could
not inform parents when a student became pregnant and wanted to have an
abortion.

Common Sense lost the will to live as the churches became businesses;
and criminals received better treatment than their victims.

Common Sense took a beating when you couldn’t defend yourself from a
burglar in your own home and the burglar could sue you for assault.

Common Sense finally gave up the will to live, after a woman failed to
realize that a steaming cup of coffee was hot. She spilled a little in
her lap, and was promptly awarded a huge settlement.

Common Sense was preceded in death, by his parents, Truth and Trust, by
his wife, Discretion, by his daughter, Responsibility, and by his son,
Reason.

He is survived by his 4 stepbrothers;
I Know My Rights
I Want It Now
Someone Else Is To Blame
I’m A Victim

Not many attended his funeral because so few realized he was gone. If
you still remember him, pass this on. If not, join the majority and do
nothing.  :(

This is a very candid and comprehensive interview with Donald Trump by WSJ. Hopefully, the GOP will reciprocate the massive support he has given them the past 25+ years….
Please check out the ‘Stump for Trump 2012′ grassroots campaign to encourage Mr. Trump to at least get on the ballot and let the chips fall where they may….

Congress is currently embroiled in a funding fight over how much to spend on less than one-fifth of the federal budget for the next six months. Whether we cut $33 billion or $61 billion—that is, whether we shave 2% or 4% off of this year’s deficit—is important. It’s a sign that the election did in fact change the debate in Washington from how much we should spend to how much spending we should cut.

Steve Moore has the details on Rep. Paul Ryan’s plan to cut spending.

But this morning the new House Republican majority will introduce a budget that moves the debate from billions in spending cuts to trillions. America is facing a defining moment. The threat posed by our monumental debt will damage our country in profound ways, unless we act.

No one person or party is responsible for the looming crisis. Yet the facts are clear: Since President Obama took office, our problems have gotten worse. Major spending increases have failed to deliver promised jobs. The safety net for the poor is coming apart at the seams. Government health and retirement programs are growing at unsustainable rates. The new health-care law is a fiscal train wreck. And a complex, inefficient tax code is holding back American families and businesses.

The president’s recent budget proposal would accelerate America’s descent into a debt crisis. It doubles debt held by the public by the end of his first term and triples it by 2021. It imposes $1.5 trillion in new taxes, with spending that never falls below 23% of the economy. His budget permanently enlarges the size of government. It offers no reforms to save government health and retirement programs, and no leadership.

Our budget, which we call The Path to Prosperity, is very different. For starters, it cuts $6.2 trillion in spending from the president’s budget over the next 10 years, reduces the debt as a percentage of the economy, and puts the nation on a path to actually pay off our national debt. Our proposal brings federal spending to below 20% of gross domestic product (GDP), consistent with the postwar average, and reduces deficits by $4.4 trillion.

A study just released by the Heritage Center for Data Analysis projects that The Path to Prosperity will help create nearly one million new private-sector jobs next year, bring the unemployment rate down to 4% by 2015, and result in 2.5 million additional private-sector jobs in the last year of the decade. It spurs economic growth, with $1.5 trillion in additional real GDP over the decade. According to Heritage’s analysis, it would result in $1.1 trillion in higher wages and an average of $1,000 in additional family income each year.

Here are its major components:

• Reducing spending: This budget proposes to bring spending on domestic government agencies to below 2008 levels, and it freezes this category of spending for five years. The savings proposals are numerous, and include reforming agricultural subsidies, shrinking the federal work force through a sensible attrition policy, and accepting Defense Secretary Robert Gates’s plan to target inefficiencies at the Pentagon.

• Welfare reform: This budget will build upon the historic welfare reforms of the late 1990s by converting the federal share of Medicaid spending into a block grant that lets states create a range of options and gives Medicaid patients access to better care. It proposes similar reforms to the food-stamp program, ending the flawed incentive structure that rewards states for adding to the rolls. Finally, this budget recognizes that the best welfare program is one that ends with a job—it consolidates dozens of duplicative job-training programs into more accessible, accountable career scholarships that will better serve people looking for work.

As we strengthen and improve welfare programs for those who need them, we eliminate welfare for those who don’t. Our budget targets corporate welfare, starting by ending the conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that is costing taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars. It gets rid of the permanent Wall Street bailout authority that Congress created last year. And it rolls back expensive handouts for uncompetitive sources of energy, calling instead for a free and open marketplace for energy development, innovation and exploration.

• Health and retirement security: This budget’s reforms will protect health and retirement security. This starts with saving Medicare. The open-ended, blank-check nature of the Medicare subsidy threatens the solvency of this critical program and creates inexcusable levels of waste. This budget takes action where others have ducked. But because government should not force people to reorganize their lives, its reforms will not affect those in or near retirement in any way.

Starting in 2022, new Medicare beneficiaries will be enrolled in the same kind of health-care program that members of Congress enjoy. Future Medicare recipients will be able to choose a plan that works best for them from a list of guaranteed coverage options. This is not a voucher program but rather a premium-support model. A Medicare premium-support payment would be paid, by Medicare, to the plan chosen by the beneficiary, subsidizing its cost.

In addition, Medicare will provide increased assistance for lower-­income beneficiaries and those with greater health risks. Reform that empowers individuals—with more help for the poor and the sick—will guarantee that Medicare can fulfill the promise of health security for America’s seniors.

Getty Images/Imagezoo

ryan

ryan

We must also reform Social Security to prevent severe cuts to future benefits. This budget forces policy makers to work together to enact common-sense reforms. The goal of this proposal is to save Social Security for current retirees and strengthen it for future generations by building upon ideas offered by the president’s bipartisan fiscal commission.

• Budget enforcement: This budget recognizes that it is not enough to change how much government spends. We must also change how government spends. It proposes budget-process reforms—including real, enforceable caps on spending—to make sure government spends and taxes only as much as it needs to fulfill its constitutionally prescribed roles.

• Tax reform: This budget would focus on growth by reforming the nation’s outdated tax code, consolidating brackets, lowering tax rates, and assuming top individual and corporate rates of 25%. It maintains a revenue-neutral approach by clearing out a burdensome tangle of deductions and loopholes that distort economic activity and leave some corporations paying no income taxes at all.

This is America’s moment to advance a plan for prosperity. Our budget offers the nation a model of government that is guided by the timeless principles of the American idea: free-market democracy, open competition, a robust private sector bound by rules of honesty and fairness, a secure safety net, and equal opportunity for all under a limited constitutional government of popular consent.

We can reform government so that people don’t have to reorient their lives for less. We can grow our economy, promote opportunity, and encourage upward mobility. This budget is the new House majority’s answer to history’s call. It is now up to all of us to keep America exceptional.

Written by Mr. Ryan, a Republican via Wall Street Journal.  He represents Wisconsin’s first congressional district and serves as chairman of the House Budget Committee.

 

Donald Trump has been playing a ‘full house’ in the media lately and is creating a brew ha ha nationwide. Should he put his hat in the race for President in 2012?  I encourage everyone to ponder this proposal, do some research on recent campaign finance/election history, realize the reality of our dire status as a nation, get out of denial regarding the ‘funding factor’ of campaigns and help support, at the very least, getting Mr. Trump on the ballot in 2012!  Let us ban together and make this mission – possible!  Please “like” the ‘Stump for Trump 2012’ Facebook fanpage, follow on Twitter, check out the ‘Stump4Trump’ website , take the poll below and spread the word….

Here are the reasons why Donald Trump would be a formidable ‘winning’ candidate to serve this great country:

  1. He will be the first American to really stand-up boldly for America and not be intimidated by anyone.
  2. He is one of the most successful businessmen in the U.S. who has the knowledge of markets, economy, foreign trade, job creation, professional diplomacy and wealth generation.
  3. Because of his wealth and stature, he will not have to rely so heavily on lobbyists and special interest groups for funding. (Trump told ABC‘s “Good Morning America” that he can spend as much as $600 million of his personal fortune.  “Part of the beauty of me is that I’m very rich,” he told the show)
  4. He will make sure that we have ‘fair trade’ with other nations instead of the one-sided ‘free trade’
  5. He will do everything in his will to keep the terrorists at bay.
  6. He has good relationships worldwide with leaders and officials.
  7. He will restore the value of OUR dollar that is severely in peril.
  8. He will negotiate better deals with China.
  9. He will drill and use our abundant resources of natural gas along with wind, electric, solar power and other ‘green’ alternatives so we do not have to rely on foreign oil.
  10. He will be able to draw votes and respect from all sides of the aisle: Republicans, Democrats & Independents due  to his popularity, success and celebrity status.

 

There has been much chatter the past week regarding Governor Rick Snyder (MI) and his proposed budget plan.  A plethora of non-credible and partially accurate  information  has been circling around the country and the internet  by some cable news reporters, bloggers, pundits  and journalists that has heads spinning.  Please read my recent article entitled: Fight or flight – what’s the real skinny on Gov. Snyder’s proposed budget?

Should the citizens of MI be patient with Gov. Rick Snyder’s proposed shared sacrifice???

Please take the poll below and decide…

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Congressional Squatters Making Our House Their Home? Dozens of U.S. congressmen, both Republican and Democrat, have been ‘sleeping- over’ in their offices for decades to save money, oftentimes, appearing  like they are being ‘frugal’  to their constituents, despite their annual salaries of $174,000 plus Cadillac benefit packages of $40,000 +???   Should this bunking be debunked or is it just much ado about nothing?  Please watch this video from the Today Show recently and take the poll below – you decide….  :-)

 

 

 

The economic climate in Michigan has been dismal for decades and now the new Governor, Rick Snyder, has proposed his new budget that has created controversy on both sides of the aisle despite his candid, business oriented approach regarding having to make some difficult decisions that require shared sacrifices for all.   Please read my article entitled:

Gov. Snyder’s Budget is in – Report card of pass, fail or Spring Break??? and give this bold Governor a grade on his ‘Fix Michigan’ budget proposal thus far….